Helping Students Develop Information Skills is Everyone’s Business Examining Information Contexts Welcome Lauren Hays, Librarian @Lib_Lauren MidAmerica Nazarene University, Kansas, USA Claes Dahlqvist, Librarian @clabbedahl Kristianstad University, Kristianstad, Sweden Erik Christiansen, Librarian @eriksation Mount Royal University, Calgary, Canada 2 3 Outline 1. Objectives and purpose 2. Define information literacy 3. Discuss the theoretical underpinnings of information literacy 4. Overview of the United States and Canadian context 5. Overview of the Swedish context 6. Group brainstorm activity and discussion (information contexts) 7. Information literacy through the SoTL lens 8. Critiques of information literacy and future research directions within SoTL 4 Objectives By the end of this session, participants will have ● Defined information literacy ● Discussed the information literacy skills in their disciplinary/professional context ● Developed ideas about how information literacy is best taught in their discipline ● Explain how SoTL practices can strengthen information literacy research 5 1 Information Literacy Theory and Practice Foundations and ties to SoTL ACRL “ Information literacy is the set of integrated abilities encompassing the reflective discovery of information, the understanding of how information is produced and valued, and the use of information in creating new knowledge and participating ethically in communities of learning 7 Alexandria Proclamation “ Information literacy empowers people in all walks of life to seek, evaluate, use and create information effectively to achieve their personal, social, occupational and educational goals. It is a basic human right in a digital world and promotes social inclusion in all nations 8 Theoretical I.L. teaching and learning perspectives Behaviorism - Focus on passive learners´ observable and measurable generic transferable behavior and skills Constructivism - Focus on learners´ construction of internal active behavior and experiences   Phenomenography – Focus on learners´ variation in experiencing phenomena Social constructivist theory – Focus on learners´ as active part of situated contexts and communities of practice Photo by Iñaki del Olmo on Unsplash (Limberg, L., Sundin, O., & Talja, S., 2013; Marton, F. & Booth, S., 1997; Pilerot & Hedman, 2009; Rosman, Mayer, & Krampen, 2016; Vygotsky, 1962; Wenger, 1998) 10 Group discussion What are the essential information literacy skills in your discipline? What skills do your students need to be successful in your discipline? Photo by Dylan Gillis on Unsplash 14 Common instructional approaches One-shots Embedded librarianship Liaison vs functional teams Photo by NeONBRAND on Unsplash (Abrizah et al., 2016; Stephens, 2018; Bruce, 2016) 15 Traditional I.L. research (i) Four phases of I.L. research (history), Lloyd and Williamson, 2008 One - Precursors phase, information skills and bibliographic instruction Two - Experimental phase, I.L. used in a research context in education Three - Exploratory phase, moving beyond a positivist approach Four - Evolving phase (current), moving away from educational and other contexts and recognizing the variety of cultural settings CC image by Startaê Team on Unsplash 16 Traditional I.L. research (ii) Local experiences in the classroom ● ● Reporting on new instructional approaches (local) Understanding student I.L. competencies (discipline and institution specific) ○ Fluency with different resources and concepts Broad ● ● ● ● Survey I.L. instruction at a national-level Threshold concepts Theories and frameworks Curricular integration I.L. research tends to be highly collaborative CC image by Startaê Team on Unsplash 17 2 Regional Contexts for Information Literacy Maps 19 The North American Context United States and Canada Image by Erik Christiansen (CC-BY 4.0) 20 North America: Mount Royal University University ● ● ● ● Small undergraduate university in Calgary, Alberta, Canada Approximated 9500 full-time students Focus on teaching over research Heavy SoTL research focus Librarians ● ● ● Full faculty status Primary responsibility is information literacy instruction and teaching equivalent activities Librarians also involved in research and service CC image by Erik Christiansen 21 North America: I.L. instruction prevalence (i) United States (Julien et al., 2018) ● ● 55% of respondents were full-time instruction librarians Undergraduate and first-year students were the primary target demographic Canada (Julien et al., 2013) ● ● Fewer percentage of full-time instruction librarians (29%). ○ Responsibility shared among multiple reference librarians Majority of respondents felt I.L. instruction should be a shared responsibility CC image by CollegeWiseCEL on Flikr 22 North America: I.L. instruction prevalence (ii) Bury (2016) - Faculty perceptions I.L. Instruction ● ● ● ● Surveyed faculty from a university in Toronto Majority of respondents address I.L. in their teaching and thought librarians play a critical role Respondents in favour of diverse instructional methods/approaches Authors stress importance of partnership and programmatic instruction CC image by CollegeWiseCEL on Flikr 23 North America: Challenges Challenges facing librarians is almost identical between countries ● Faculty buy-in ● Ratio of librarians to students (especially when demand is high) ● Maintaining student engagement ● Curricular integration CC image by JESHOOTS.COM on Unsplash (Bury, 2016; Julien et al., 2018) 24 The Western European Context Sweden 25 Sweden: A very brief history of I.L. instruction From bibliographic instruction to I.L. instruction ○ From focus on systems and sources to focus on students´ behavior and learning, including I.L. The Bologna process ○ ○ Even more focus on students´ learning and I.L. Librarians involved in I.L. curricula design CC image by Kristianstad University (Attard, A., Di Iorio, E., Geven, K. & Santa, R., 2010; Boyer, 1990; Lindberg, 2015; Limberg, L., Sundin, O., & Talja, S. 2013; Pilerot, 2018; Virkus, 2003) 26 Sweden: I.L. instruction today ● ● ● ● I.L. instruction today a fundamental part of Swedish academic librarians’ professional practice Librarians do not have faculty status Most universities have I.L. instruction functional teams I.L. and library and Information Science research strongly influenced by sociocultural theory of learning - information practices ○ Gap between I.L. research and I.L. instruction practitioners (librarians) CC image by Kristianstad University (Pilerot, 2014; Limberg, L., Sundin, O., & Talja, S. 2013) 27 Sweden: I.L. instruction at Kristianstad University ILO´s Constructive alignment in information practices Librarian-faculty collaboration essential for success Intended learning outcomes (ILO´s) ● I.L. in information practices Integrated in discipline- and course-specific curricula Teaching and learning activities (TLA´s) ● Integrated with discipline- and course-specific TLA´s ○ Lectures and workshop ○ Flipped classroom Assessment tasks (AT´s) ● AT`s TLA´s Integrated with discipline- and course-specific TLA´s  Seminars  Worksheets  Quiz (Biggs, 2011; Limberg, L., Sundin, O., & Talja, S. 2013, Vygotsky, 1962) 28 Sweden: Challenges Challenges facing Swedish and North American librarians are similar: ● ● ● ● ● Recognition as teachers Collaboration faculty - librarians, librarians - educational developers, librarians - students Integrating I.L. in curricula Ratio of librarians to students Bridging the gap between I.L. research and I.L. practices (Andersson, 2015; Pilerot, 2018; Limberg, L., Sundin, O., & Talja, S. 2013) CC image by JESHOOTS.COM on Unsplash 29 Group discussion What are the essential information literacy skills in your national/cultural context? Are there common challenges your students encounter? Photo by Dylan Gillis on Unsplash 30 3 Information Literacy through the SoTL lens Opportunities Criticism of information literacy Treatment of I.L. as its own discipline and decontextualization of information skills (Farrel & Badke, 2015; Pilerot, 2016)  Treated as generic skills that librarians prescribe across disciplines Little evolution beyond the traditional ‘one-shot’ model / course-level instruction (Saunders, 2012) Despite the level of instruction, I.L. has not become a priority for disciplines’ curricula (McGuinness, 2006)   Faculty still see I.L. as an essential skill I.L. seen as disciplinary-specific and are learned by doing (situated socio-cultural practices) 32 Opportunities in SoTL Bradley, 2009 ● Provides librarians another avenue to develop their own teaching practices ○ SoTL underrepresented in the library literature ○ Framing teaching in SoTL terms Bring information literacy outside of the library and information science domain ● ● Forge new faculty collaborations Develop the disciplinary contexts CC image by Javier Allegue Barros on Unsplash 33 Bridging the gap 34 CC image by Cody Hiscox on Unsplash Thanks for attending! Contact information Lauren Hays - MidAmerica Nazarene University ldhays@mnu.edu Claes Dahlqvist - Kristianstad University claes.dahlqvist@hkr.se Erik Christiansen - Mount Royal University echristiansen@mtroyal.ca 35 References (i) Andersson, H. (2015). Informationskompetens i högskolans kursplaner: En kvalitativ textanalys. Master thesis, Akademin för bibliotek, information, pedagogik och IT. Borås: Högskolan i Borås. Association of College and Research Libraries. (2015). Framework for information literacy for higher education. Retrieved from http://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/ilframework Attard, A., Di Iorio, E., Geven, K. & Santa, R. (2010). Student Centred Learning: Toolkit for Students, Staff and Higher Education Institutions. Brussels: European Students´ Union and Education International. Beacons of the information society: The Alexandria proclamation on information literacy and lifelong learning. (2005). Retrieved from https://www.ifla.org/publications/beacons-of-the-information-society-thealexandria-proclamation-on-information-literacy Biggs, J.B. & Tang, C.S. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university: what the student does. (4., [rev.] ed.) Maidenhead: Open University Press Marton, F. & Booth, S. (1997). Learning and awareness. Mahwah, N.J.: Erlbaum. Boyer, E. L. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered : priorities of the professoriate. Princeton, N.J.: The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. Bradley, C. (2009, May). The scholarship of teaching and learning. College & Research Libraries News, 70(5). Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/203825337/ Bruce. C., Edwards, S., & Lupton M. (2006). Six Frames for Information literacy Education: a conceptual framework for interpreting the relationships between theory and practice. Innovation in Teaching and Learning in Information and Computer Sciences, 5(1), 1-18. DOI: 10.11120/ital.2006.05010002 Bury, S. (2016). Learning from faculty voices on information literacy. Reference Services Review, 44(3), 237–252. doi:10.1108/RSR-11-2015-0047 Farrell, R. & Badke, W. (2015). Situating information literacy in the disciplines: A practical and systematic approach for academic librarians. Reference Services Review 43(2), 319-340. https://doi.org/10.1108/RSR-11-20140052 Limberg, L., Sundin, O., & Talja, S. (2013). Three theoretical perspectives on information literacy. Human IT: Journal for Information Technology Studies as a Human Science, 11(2). Julien, H., Tan, M., & Merillat, S. (2013). Instruction for Information Literacy in Canadian Academic Libraries: A Longitudinal Analysis of Aims, Methods, and Success. Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science, 37(2), 81–102. https://doi.org/10.1353/ils.2013.0007 Julien, H., Gross, M., & Latham, D. (2018). Survey of information literacy instructional practices in U.S. academic libraries. College & Research Libraries 79(2), 179-199. doi:10.5860/crl.79.2.179 Lindberg, J. (2015). Att bli bibliotekarie: informationssökning och yrkesidentiteter hos B&I-studenter och nyanställda högskolebibliotekarier. Diss. Borås : Högskolan i Borås, 2015. Borås. Lloyd, A. & Williamson, K. (2008). Towards an understand of information literacy in context: Implications for research. Journal of LibrarianShip & Information Science 40(1), p. 3-12. DOI: 10.1177/0961000607086616 McGuinness, C. (2006), “What faculty think – exploring the barriers to information literacy development in undergraduate education”, The Journal of Academic Librarianship, Vol. 32 No. 6, pp. 573-582. 36 References (ii) Pilerot, O. (2014). Connections between research and practice in the information literacy narrative : A mapping of the literature and some propositions. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 48(4), 313–321. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961000614559140 Pilerot, O. (2018). Information literacies in higher education : A Swedish perspective. Éducation Comparée / Nouvelle Série, 19, 261–289. Retrieved from http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:hb:diva-1477 Pilerot, O. & Hedman, J. (2009). Är informationskompetens överförbar? [Is information literacy transferable?], In: Hansson, B. & Lyngfelt, A. (Eds.) Pedagogiskt arbete i teori och praktik: Om bibliotekens roll för studenters och doktoranders lärande. Lund: BTJ förlag. pp. 7-44 Saunders, L. (2012), “Faculty perspectives on information literacy as a student learning outcome”, Journal of Academic Librarianship, Vol. 38 No. 4, pp. 226-236. Virkus, S. (2003). Information literacy in Europe: a literature. Information Research. 8(4), 1-56 Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Vygotskij, L.S. (1962). Thought and language. Cambridge, Massachusetts: M.I.T. Press. 37 Credits Special thanks to all the people who made and released these awesome resources for free:   Presentation template by SlidesCarnival Photographs by Unsplash 38 Presentation design This presentation uses the following typographies:   Titles: Poppins Bold Body copy: Poppins Light You can download the fonts at: https://www.fontsquirrel.com/fonts/poppins You don’t need to keep this slide in your presentation. It’s only here to serve you as a design guide if you need to create new slides or download the fonts to edit the presentation in PowerPoint® 39 For an editable version of this document, please contact Erik Christiansen using the link below. Website: https://erikchristiansen.net/contact/